Stevens says that a professor in a criminal justice course she took last year gave her a zero on a paper because he said that the AI-detection system in Turnitin flagged it as robot-written. Stevens insists the work is entirely her own and that she did not use chatgpt prompts to avoid ai detection or any other chatbot to compose any part of her paper. Along with that, ensure to incorporate your unique perspective, voice, and analysis. Remember that the responsibility for the final content rests with you. It’s hard to tell how much plagiarism you’ll find in ChatGPT’s generated content.

As more and more educational institutions move towards online learning, AI content detection has become increasingly important. With students submitting work electronically, it can be difficult to ensure that work is original, human made, and free of plagiarism. One of the key benefits of AI content detection in education is its ability to help maintain academic integrity. By ensuring that students are submitting original work, educational institutions can ensure that grades and degrees accurately reflect a student’s abilities and knowledge. Employing an AI content detection tool is important–but it’s best employed as a single quality check in your submission review process.
Giving AI an author byline is probably not the best way to follow our recommendation to make clear to readers when AI is part of the content creation process. If you see AI as an essential way to help you produce content that is helpful and original, it might be useful to consider. If you see AI as an inexpensive, easy way to game search engine rankings, then no.